HOME

This website does not belong to Drs. Herbert Nevyas, Anita Nevyas, or Nevyas Eye Associates!

This website is to show the deficiencies of following Federal standards, protocols, and regulations BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER an FDA sanctioned investigational study.

The following letters are from the FDA to Drs. Herbert Nevyas and Anita Nevyas-Wallace throughout their investigational study, and after their study was terminated. Despite continued deficiencies as noted below, the FDA kept granting the Nevyases Approvals for their study. Based on documents received during my med mal and the current Nevyas v. Morgan lawsuits, I believe the Nevyases constantly misrepresented themselves and their study to both Schullman Associates (the Nevyases IRB) the FDA and the courts:

All BLUE font on this page designate links to documents which should open in new window.

Again and again and again, but the doctors claimed numerous times under oath they’ve never done anything to violate any FDA rules, regulations, or protocols:

SOURCE

Nevyas Eye Associates 6/5/12

Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20993

June 5, 2012

WARNING LETTER

VIA UNITED PARCEL SERVICE

Herbert J. Nevyas, M.D. Medical Director Nevyas Eye Associates Two Bala Plaza PL-33 333 E. City Avenue Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania 19004-1501

Dear Dr. Nevyas:

During an inspection of your firm located in Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, on March 19-28, 2012, an investigator from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined that your firm is a medical device user facility that is subject to the statutory reporting requirements of the Medical Device Reporting (MDR) regulation, found at Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 803.

The ophthalmic laser used at your facility to perform Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis procedures is a medical device under Section 201(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act), 21 U.S.C. § 321(h), because it is intended for the use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions or in the cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of disease, or to affect the structure or function of the body.

Our inspection revealed that this device is misbranded under section 502(t)(2) of the Act, 21 U.S.D. § 352(t)(2), in that your firm failed or refused to furnish material or information respecting the device that is required by or under section 519 of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 360i, and 21 CFR Part 803 – Medical Device Reporting. Significant violations include, but are not limited to, the following:

Failure to develop, maintain, and implement written MDR procedures, as required by 21 CFR 803.17. For example, the investigator asked the medical director and refractory consultants if the facility had written MDR procedures and they confirmed that they did not and did not know what events would be considered serious injuries and reportable to manufacturers. The investigator reviewed some of the adverse events identified in the assignment guidance with them and they confirmed that these types of events have occurred at their facility. They explained that they inform their patients through the consenting process that they may have vision-threatening complications following the surgery.

We reviewed your firm’s response dated April 2, 2012, and concluded that it is not adequate because it did not include a copy of your firm’s MDR procedures. Your firm should take prompt action to correct the violations addressed in this letter. Failure to promptly correct these violations may result in regulatory action being initiated by the FDA without further notice. These actions include, but are not limited to, seizure, injunction, and civil money penalties. Also, federal agencies may be advised of the issuance of Warning Letters about devices so that they may take this information into account when considering the award of contracts.

Please notify this office in writing within fifteen business days from the date you receive this letter of the specific steps your firm has taken to correct the noted violations, as well as an explanation of how your firm plans to prevent these violations, or similar violations, from occurring again. Include documentation of the corrections and/or corrective actions (including any systemic corrective actions) that your firm has taken. If your firm’s planned corrections and/or corrective actions will occur over time, please include a timetable for implementation of those activities. If corrections and/or corrective actions cannot be completed within fifteen business days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which these activities will be completed. Your firm’s response should be comprehensive and address all violations included in this Warning Letter.

Your firm’s response should be sent to: Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Surveillance and Biometrics, MDR Policy Branch, White Oak Building 66, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Room 3208, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993. Refer to the Unique Identification Number #306398 when replying. If you have any questions about the contents of this letter or wish to discuss MDR reportability criteria or schedule further communications, please contact: MDR Policy Branch at (301) 796-6670 or by email at MDRPolicy@fda.hhs.gov.

Finally, you should know that this letter is not intended to be an all-inclusive list of the violations at your firm. It is your firm’s responsibility to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations administered by FDA. The specific violations noted in this letter and in the Inspectional Observations, Form FDA 483, issued at the close of the inspection, may be symptomatic of serious problems in your firm. Your firm should investigate and determine the causes of the violations and take prompt actions to correct the violations and bring the device into compliance. Sincerely yours, /S/ Steven D. Silverman Director Office of Compliance Center for Devices and Radiological Health

 

Nevyases were issued an FDA483:

PAGE 1There was no documentation to show that the CI notified the IRB about all amendments, changes of significant deviations to the protocol [per IRB requirements] prior to implementation. For example, the FDA granted your firm an increase in the number of subjects you could treat with your investigational device on Jan. 20, 1999. IRB. Annual Review dated 7/29/00 does not indicate the IRB knew about population increase. The IRB did not approve the population increase until. August 28, 2000, 20 months later.

The firm is not complying with the Investigator Agreement which was signed and dated by the Clinical Investigator at the beginning of the Clinical Study.

There was a lapse of IRB approval for the protocol: NEV-97-001 from 8/3/2000 until 8/29/2000 according to IRB, lapse notices and the IRB annual reapproval letter.

 

April 2002

IDE Deficiencies Request Letter from the FDA to Nevyases:

PAGE 11. You must still provide responses to deficiencies 1, 2, 3, and 5 froth our letter of February 6, 2002. 2. You did not provide the requested information in your response to deficiency 4.

PAGE 24. In response to deficiency 8, you have indicated how you will verify your current accountability for visits that have already past. After your internal audit is complete and you have more insight as to the reasons for any problems with accountability, please directly address the original issue outlined in previous deficiency 8: please describe how you intend to improve subject follow-up and data reporting during the rest of the course of your IDE study.

PAGE 3 – Attachment: In a reply to Dr. Morris Waxler, FDA’s Chief Medical Device Examiner, Dr. Herbert Nevyas states “Since the close of business on July 28, 1997, neither I nor anyone else has used the laser. I certify that, unless and until FDA approves the IDE application for that device, neither I nor anyone else will use the laser to treat patients. I have notified all of my employees, as well as anyone with access to the laser, that the laser may not and will not be used until there is an approved IDE in effect for that laser. I declare that to the best of my knowledge the foregoing is true and correct.”

February 2002

Nevyases Deviations and discrepancies continue almost 5 years into their study – Letter from the FDA to Nevyases:

PAGE 1Please address the following, questions and concerns with regard to this submission, which also applied to the previous, delinquent, annual report as outlined in FDA’s letter of April 10, 2001, and for which we never received a response:

PAGE 25. Please provide tables (similar to those requested for initial treatments) and narrative summarizing the results of the IDE substudy of enhancements for 25 subjects/50 eyes that had undergone treatment prior to implementation of the IDE, and of the data from enhancements performed for eyes enrolled under the IDE. Please provide separate analyses for the first enhancement, second enhancement, etc.

PAGE 31. Please note that, based on the stability analyses you have provided in this submission, we do not agree that the time point of stability is at 12 months postoperatively as you have indicated, and, in fact, may be earlier for some of the indications.

PAGE 4

August 2001

Supplement Disapproval Letter from the FDA to Nevyases:

PAGE 1We regret to inform you that your supplement is disapproved and you may not implement the change in your investigation. Our disapproval is based on the following deficiencies: 1. An important function of the software in the device is to control the beam delivery hardware (iris size, slot movement, synchronizing iris/slot with laser pulses, etc.) in the creation of an ablation pattern. This area, however, is not discussed at all in the Software Requirement Specifications document.

PAGE 2The deficiencies identified above represent the issues that we believe need to be resolved before your IDE application can be approved.

PAGE 3

July 2001

Disapproval Letter from the FDA to Nevyases:

PAGE 1The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reviewed the supplement to your investigational device exemptions (IDE) application proposing two new clinical protocols to evaluate the spherical ablation algorithm. We regret to inform you that your supplement is disapproved and you may not implement the change in your investigation. Our disapproval is based on the following deficiencies which, unless otherwise specified, relate to both protocols:

PAGE 23. You have not provided in your protocol the methodology for performing any of the clinical evaluations. For each clinical evaluation, please specify the testing procedures and instruments that will be used, including the lighting conditions and charts you will use to measure distance vision and near vision, etc.

PAGE 37. Your protocol states that subjects must have a best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of at least 20/40 in each eye in order to be enrolled in the study. Please be advised that while we find this criteria acceptable for subjects with high myopia (>7 D MRSE), in order for subjects with low myopia (< 7 D MRSE) to be enrolled, we recommend a BSCVA of at least 20/25 in each eye. Please revise your protocol accordingly, or justify not doing so.

PAGE 421. The Conclusion section of the consent form stares, “There is always a possibility of one or more late complications That were not known or anticipated at the time of this writing (1997).” It also states, “LASIK is investigational surgery and as such, it has not yet been completely and exhaustively studied by the FDA and medical researchers in this country.” Please update the consent form as necessary in keeping with current knowledge including the additions previously mentioned. Please revise the second statement to Improve its accuracy: LASIK is no longer investigational, it has never (page 5) been studied by the FDA, and the FDA does not regulate LASIK, only the devices used for the procedure.

PAGE 528. There are discrepancies in the way you refer to the protocols throughout the submission. For example, in the Introduction you refer to the new protocols as NEV-97-002 (Myopia/Myopic Astigmatism) and NEV-97-003 (Hyperopia/Hyperopic Astigmatism). However, the myopia protocol itself has been labeled with the protocol number NEV-01-002. To avoid confusion, please make all necessary revisions in any future submission to correct such discrepancies.

PAGE 6With respect to the profiles of your ablated PMMA samples:

PAGE 7The deficiencies identified above represent the issues that we believe need to be resolved before your IDE application can be approved. In developing the deficiencies, we carefully considered the relevant statutory criteria for Agency decision-making as well as the burden that may be incurred in your attempt to respond to the deficiencies.

PAGE 834. Please be advised that for possible future pre-market approval, although 300 eyes total are needed to support overall safety, data from approximately 125 eyes are needed to support each indication for which approval is being sought.

April 2001

Request Letter from the FDA to Nevyases:

PAGE 1Please address the following questions/concerns, as well as provide the information requested in the tables enclosed with this letter.

PAGE 28. With regard to your future PMA submission, you have indicated that only subjects treated with the “new centration technique” will be included in the PMA, and that you have selected the eyes treated between 2/19/98 and 11/22/99 as the cohort to support the safety and effectiveness of the device. We would like to clarify that data from all subjects treated. under the IDE should be included in the PMA. The main PMA cohort on which the decision of the safety and effectiveness of the device will mainly rest may be limited to all eyes treated with the new centration technique, but not to only those enrolled during a given period of time, as you appear to have suggested.

PAGE 3

January 2001

Letter from the FDA to Nevyases Re: Non-Response To Request:

PAGE 1The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted approval of your investigational device exemptions (IDE) application on August 7, 1997. As part of your responsibilities as sponsor of a significant risk device investigation, you are required to submit a progress report to FDA and to all reviewing institutional review boards (IRBs) on at least a yearly basis. We have not received a response to FDA’s November 10, 1999 request for additional information regarding your August 1998 — August 1999 annual progress report (enclosed).

PAGE 2

November 1999

Request Letter from the FDA to Nevyases:

PAGE 11. Please separate IDE subjects from pre-IDE subjects in all of your tables, or report only on IDE subjects.

PAGE 2

January 1999

Deviations of Nevyas Eye Associates, As Stated In Letter from the FDA dated 01/07/99:

PAGE 1Our review of the inspection report submitted by the district revealed deviations from Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, (21 CFR), Part 812 – Investigstional Device Exemptions and Part 50 – Protection of Human Subjects and Section 520(g) of the Act. The deviations noted during the inspection were listed on form FDA-483, “Inspectional Observations,” which was presented to and discussed with you at the conclusion of the inspection.

PAGE 2Use of the Summit laser at your Marlton, New Jersey site for off-label procedures is not included in your IDE protocol. Moreover, enhancements approved under your IDE do not include hyperopic procedures. It is therefore considered a protocol violation to retreat subjects of your IDE study using the Summit laser and performing hyperopic LASIK.

PAGE 3While your Marlton, New Jersey site has a Summit laser, the advertisement does not specify a location. Future advertisements should specify the location(s) of approved lasers, as the enclosed advertisement would not be appropriate for soliciting subjects for your IDE study. All promotional materials designed to solicit participants or to inform subjects about the IDE study need to be approved by the reviewing IRB.

Approval Letter from the FDA to Nevyases dated 01/20/99:

PAGE 1Please be aware of the following: In Table 1-1, the data appear to be quite scattered, with some subjects actually increasing in sensitivity during glare (e.g., see BC & CB at 3 cycles per degree (CPD)), while others are severely compromised (see ZM). In order to reduce variability in the data in the contrast sensitivity study, the person administering the test should have experience in this test and the subjects should be well trained prior to testing.

PAGE 2We continue to be concerned that your ablation is likely to have multifocal properties, which means some light will be out of focus even at the best focal plane.

December 1998

Approval Letter from the FDA to Nevyases:

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

Nevyases’ Co-Investigators  (dated 10/01/98)

I started some time ago to contact the doctors on this LIST the Nevyases sent to the FDA, as being co-investigators. Three of those contacted who responded have never even heard of the Nevyases.

September 1998

Approval Letter from the FDA to Nevyases:

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

July 1998

“Conditional” Approval Letter from the FDA to Nevyases:

PAGE 1FDA cannot approve your request as proposed because you have not shown stability of manifest refraction, and you have not presented sufficient detail for your hyperopic retreatment. FDA will conditionally approve, however, an expansion to include myopia and myopic astigmatism retreatments at this time.

PAGE 2This approval is being granted on the condition chat, within 45 days from the date of this letter, you submit your agreement to: 1. conduct the investigation within the modified limit, i.e., retreatment for myopia or myopic astigmatism only; 2. extend the minimum time between the initial operation and the retreatment to 3 months; and, 3. retreat only eyes which are “white and quiet” and in which refractive stability has been documented with two manifest refractions taken at least 30 days apart at less than 1 diopter of—change, confirmed by topography.,

PAGE 3

May 1998

Approval Letter from the FDA to Nevyases dated 05/14/98 Re: Contrast Sensitivity & Increased ‘Subjects’:

PAGE 1 – ‘Conditional’ approval for substudy and increase of ‘subjects’.

PAGE 2We acknowledge your request in your original IDE (dated March 18, 1997) to conduct a study at one site with 400 eyes low myopia and 590 eyes high myopia for each of two investigators (single site total of 1980 eyes or 990 subjects). We believe that adequate safety information has been provided to allow the initiation of your study with a small expansion of an additional 75 subjects (150 eyes). We will allow you to expand to the full number of subjects for this study (990) after you have received approval of supplements addressing the following deficiency from our letter of October 3, 1997 (enclosed). No additional expansions of your IDE will be granted until supplements containing the following information are approved:

PAGE 3You should also give serious consideration to the following items which are considered essential for the analysis of your data for the purposes of determining safety and effectiveness for a future PMA application: Deficiencies 5 through 16, excluding deficiency 14, in our letter of October 3, 1997.

April 1998

Letter from the FDA to Nevyases dated 04/01/98 Re: Pre Market Approval (PMA):

PAGE 1 – Offers suggestions from the FDA should the Nevyases submit their PMA.

PAGE 2

January 1998

Approval Review Letter from the FDA to Nevyases:

PAGE 1In your “Substudy for Same-Day Versus Different Day LASIK Treatment for Fellow Eyes”: a. Please revise your informed consent document rider for same day surgery to state that the second eye will be rescheduled if there is a complication or an adverse event with the first eye.

PAGE 2Your statement in the rider to the informed consent document that “…There have been no failures or malfunctions of the Willis Excimer Laser”, should be removed or altered. It may unduly influence potential same day fellow eye surgery candidates into believing that the Nevyas Excimer Laser cannot fail. FDA recommends that you remove this statement or alter it to read: “There have been no failures or malfunctions of the Nevyas Excimer Laser to date.”

PAGE 3

FDA INVESTIGATIONAL STUDY AFFIDAVIT

The following pages are an Investigator Agreement issued by the FDA to a Sponsor/Investigator of an investigational study.  Nevyas refused to sign…

PAGE 1 – Investigator agreement signed by Anita Nevyas-Wallace

PAGE 2 – Investigator agreement signed by Herbert Nevyas

PAGE 3 – “I informed Mr. Kane, that Mr. Sullivan told me that the excimer laser that he would build, is considered a custom device and would not be regulated by the FDA. Mr. Sullivan completed the assembly of the laser in the fall of 1995, and the first patient was treated (using LASIK) in January 1996.

PAGE 4 – “I did not maintain any written records of the design specifications, nor did I receive any written design specifications from Mr. Sullivan.

PAGE 5 – “This patient is not part of the patient population included in my IDE submission. I have treated a total of 252 patients, from January 1996 to the present date (6/30/97),

PAGE 6 – “I affirm that the information on this and the previous pages, is accurate, to the best of my ability. I have read, but would not sign this affidavit.

View ALL PAGES pdf document.

December 1997

Approval Review Letter from the FDA to Nevyases:

PAGE 1The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reviewed the supplement to your investigational device exemptions (IDE) application. Your application remains conditionally approved because your supplement adequately addressed only deficiency 2 cited in our October 3, 1997 letter.

This approval is being granted on the condition that, within 45 days from the date of this letter, you submit information correcting the following deficiencies.

PAGE 2You are reminded that prior to a request for expansion beyond 150 subjects, you should provide adequate responses to deficiencies 5 16 in our letter of October 3, 1997.

View ALL PAGES pdf document.

October 1997

Letter from the FDA to Nevyases dated 10/03/97:

PAGE 1We acknowledge receipt of your institutional review board (IRB) approval (supplement 3). Supplement 4 responds to our conditional approval letter of August 7, 1997 and requests: an increase crease in treatment range from -6.75 ID to -22 ID; approval to study simultaneous bilateral treatment; and, approval to retreat approximately 125 patients previously treated with this laser prior to IDE approval.

PAGE 2Requests for additional subjects for enhancements for prior clinical patients will be evaluated as additional data is submitted to support stability of the procedure.

PAGE 3You agree that you will not perform retreatment procedures for subjects initially treated under this IDE. Retreatment (enhancement) for subjects initially treated under this IDE is appropriate only after your preliminary data demonstrate safety and indicate the time point of stability of the procedure. You may begin retreatment procedures only after FDA has approved your retreatment study plan and data to support stability.

PAGE 4PAGE 5PAGE 6PAGE 7PAGE 8PAGE 9PAGE 10 – Deficiencies listed.

PAGE 11

View ALL PAGES pdf document.

August 1997

‘Conditional’ Approval Letter from the FDA to Nevyases dated 08/07/97:

PAGE 1Your application is conditionally approved because you have not adequately addressed deficiency #2 cited in our May 8, 1997 disapproval letter.

Also, we are in receipt of your certification (Amendment 4 received August 1, 1997) that you have not used the laser as of the close of business on July 28, 1997, and that you will not use the laser unless and until FDA approves the IDE applic2tion for your device

PAGE 2This approval is being granted on the condition that, within 45 days from the date of this letter, you submit information correcting the following deficiencies.

PAGE 3 – Deficiencies listed.

PAGE 4 – Deficiencies listed.

PAGE 5We have enclosed the guidance document entitled “Sponsor’s Responsibilities for a Significant Risk Device Investigation” to help you understand the functions and duties of a sponsor.

View ALL PAGES pdf document.

July 1997

Letter from the FDA to Nevyases dated 07/29/97 to cease using Laser:

PAGE 1FDA is aware that a number of physicians are using lasers for refractive surgery to treat patients even though there is no PMA or IDE in effect for their lasers. Based on the results of our investigations, we believe that you are currently using your laser to treat patients.

PAGE 2Accordingly, on July 28, 1997, we called you to notify you that use of your excimer laser to treat patients would violate the Act and requested that, if you are presently using the laser to treat patients, you immediately cease doing so.

Nevertheless, FDA does intend to consider any use of your laser to treat patients after the close of business July 28, 1997 unless and until the agency approves an IDE for your device to be grounds for disapproval of your IDE.

PAGE 3We also want you to know that if FDA approves your IDE application, you would be able to use your laser to perform only specific procedures on a limited number of subjects to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of your laser for those procedures. Studies conducted under such an IDE would be subject to all IDE regulations. See 21 C.F.R. Part 812. For example, you would be prohibited from promoting and commercializing the laser, and from representing that the device is safe and effective.

View ALL PAGES pdf document.

May 1997

IDE Disapproval Letter from the FDA to Nevyases dated 05/08/97:

PAGE 1The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reviewed your investigational device exemptions (IDE) application. We regret to inform you that your application is disapproved and you may not begin your investigation. Our disapproval is based on the deficiencies listed below.

PAGE 2 – Deficiencies listed.

PAGE 3Please explain the low effectiveness and safety outcomes achieved in your prior clinical studies and specify what steps you are taking to improve your results. Your refractive and visual outcomes were reported at one month as: MSRE for low myopes, < 57% were within ID and < 35% were within 0.5D; less than 60% achieved BUCVA > 20/40; complication and adverse events occurred in > 2% of the cases.

PAGE 4Please provide your agreement (or justification for not agreeing) that retreatments done to improve refractive outcome are NOT considered as treatment failures, whereas retreatments done to achieve resolution of an adverse event ARE considered as treatment failures.

PAGE 5Your description of study procedures, examination conditions and techniques is not adequate. Please provide a detailed description of each procedure, test and instrument to be used in the study.

PAGE 6For your follow-up visit schedule, the text on page 20 of the protocol appears to be inconsistent with the chart on page 43 of the protocol. In addition, please justify your statement on page 20 that measurement of corneal topography will be at the discretion of the investigator.

View ALL PAGES pdf document.

Because this website is not owned by the Nevyases or Nevyas Eye Associates and includes their names, the National Arbitration Forum should read THIS SECTION before they involve themselves again.

348 thoughts on “HOME

  1. Pingback: harvey

  2. Pingback: terrance

  3. Pingback: Derrick

  4. Pingback: Gilbert

  5. Pingback: maillot Honda pas cher

  6. Pingback: gucci バッグ 赤 火

  7. Pingback: Ray Ban 2156

  8. Pingback: フェンディ ビーズバッグ

  9. Pingback: womens nike air max tailwind

  10. Pingback: nike roshe run.com

  11. Pingback: http://www.postal-jeep.com/fpdb/live.asp

  12. Pingback: nike roshe run td

  13. Pingback: roshe run print mens

  14. Pingback: http://www.satelliteremotecodes.com/images/Comcast3.asp

  15. Pingback: cheap new arrivals replica handbags online sale

  16. Pingback: air max enfant

  17. Pingback: nike roshe run turquoise

  18. Pingback: when did the roshe runs come out

  19. Pingback: YSL Handbags

  20. Pingback: roshe run casual shoes

  21. Pingback: fastest wow gold

  22. Pingback: fastest wow gold

  23. Pingback: nike air max agitate

  24. Pingback: cheap wow gold

  25. Pingback: Football Games Snapbacks

  26. Pingback: NBA Snapbacks

  27. Pingback: cheap nike air max 95 trainers

  28. Pingback: wow gold

  29. Pingback: ray ban aviator leather

  30. Pingback: air max femme pas cher 2014

  31. Pingback: nouvel air max

  32. Pingback: nike roshe colors

  33. Pingback: toutes les air max

  34. Pingback: oakley sunglasses outlet

  35. Pingback: oakley sunglasses outlet

  36. Pingback: cheap ray bans

  37. Pingback: true religion mens short sleeve multi logo crew tee

  38. Pingback: oakley sunglasses wholesale

  39. Pingback: ray ban wayfarer

  40. Pingback: oakley sunglasses outlet

  41. Pingback: womens oakley sunglasses

  42. Pingback: giubbotto woolrich donna

  43. Pingback: oakley sunglasses

  44. Pingback: cheap oakley sunglasses

  45. Pingback: Sustavi

  46. Pingback: Payday loans

  47. Pingback: Payday Loans

  48. Pingback: Ray Ban Sunglasses Sale

  49. Pingback: Cheap Oakley Sunglasses

  50. Pingback: oakley sunglasses cheap

  51. Pingback: cheap ray bans for sale

  52. Pingback: ray ban outlet

  53. Pingback: cheap ray bans

  54. Pingback: oakley sunglasses wholesale distributor

  55. Pingback: oakley sunglasses cheap sale

  56. Pingback: ray bans sunglasses

  57. Pingback: ray ban store

  58. Pingback: oakley sunglasses

  59. Pingback: oakley sunglasses outlet

  60. Pingback: oakley sunglasses for women sale

  61. Pingback: cheap oakley sunglasses

  62. Pingback: oakley sunglasses for men

  63. Pingback: ray ban sale

  64. Pingback: oakley sunglasses wholesale

  65. Pingback: ray ban sunglasses outlet

  66. Pingback: ray ban outlet

  67. Pingback: ray ban aviator

  68. Pingback: ray ban sunglasses

  69. Pingback: oakley sunglasses wholesale outlet

  70. Pingback: ray ban sunglasses men

  71. Pingback: oakley sunglasses outlet

  72. Pingback: oakley store

  73. Pingback: fake oakley sunglasses

  74. Pingback: ray ban outlet store locations

  75. Pingback: ray ban aviator sunglasses sale

  76. Pingback: ray ban sunglasses

  77. Pingback: ray ban outlet

  78. Pingback: cheap oakley sunglasses wholesale

  79. Pingback: ray ban sunglasses cheap

  80. Pingback: oakleys sunglasses

  81. Pingback: ray ban sunglasses sale

  82. Pingback: oakley mens sunglasses

  83. Pingback: oakley sunglasses discount

  84. Pingback: air jordan retro 12 xii shoes black siren mens red

  85. Pingback: canada goose livigno parka women black

  86. Pingback: nike free 5.0 2015 running shoes womens purple red white

  87. Pingback: michael kors handbags

  88. Pingback: ray ban sunglasses outlet

  89. Pingback: Coach Outlet

  90. Pingback: cheap ray ban sunglasses

  91. Pingback: ray bans on sale

  92. Pingback: michael kors outlet

  93. Pingback: coach factory outlet

  94. Pingback: coach outlet online

  95. Pingback: oakley glasses

  96. Pingback: ray ban sunglasses outlet

  97. Pingback: coach factory outlet

  98. Pingback: cheap ray ban sunglasses

  99. Pingback: coach outlet online

  100. Pingback: cheap ray ban sunglasses

  101. Pingback: oakley sunglasses

  102. Pingback: coach factory online

  103. Pingback: ray ban sunglasses

  104. Pingback: coach factory online outlet

  105. Pingback: cheap oakleys

  106. Pingback: coach outlet online

  107. Pingback: michael kors handbags

  108. Pingback: michael kors outlet online

  109. Pingback: ray ban sunglasses outlet

  110. Pingback: cheap ray ban sunglasses

  111. Pingback: coach outlet online

  112. Pingback: oakley sunglasses outlet

  113. Pingback: coach factory

  114. Pingback: discount ray ban sunglasses

  115. Pingback: ray ban sunglasses

  116. Pingback: michael kors purses on sale

  117. Pingback: cheap ray bans

  118. Pingback: coach factory online sale

  119. Pingback: cheap michael kors handbags

  120. Pingback: ray ban sunglasses outlet

  121. Pingback: cheap oakley sunglasses

  122. Pingback: coach factory outlet

  123. Pingback: michael kors outlet

  124. Pingback: oakley sunglasses cheap

  125. Pingback: ray ban outlet

  126. Pingback: coach handbags

  127. Pingback: coach outlet

  128. Pingback: cheap ray bans

  129. Pingback: ray ban sunglasses

  130. Pingback: michael kors purses outlet

  131. Pingback: cheap oakleys

  132. Pingback: michael kors outlet

  133. Pingback: oakley sunglasses

  134. Pingback: coach outlet store

  135. Pingback: coach factory online

  136. Pingback: ray ban sunglasses discount

  137. Pingback: michael kors online outlet

  138. Pingback: ray ban sunglasses

  139. Pingback: cheap oakley sunglasses

  140. Pingback: oakley sunglasses outlet

  141. Pingback: coach outlet online

  142. Pingback: cheap oakley sunglasses

  143. Pingback: ray bans aviators

  144. Pingback: cheap ray bans

  145. Pingback: Brazilian Virgin Hair

  146. Pingback: oakley sunglasses wholesale

  147. Pingback: electric scooter

  148. Pingback: coach factory outlet

  149. Pingback: Ray Ban Sunglasses

  150. Pingback: Oakley Sunglasses Cheap

  151. Pingback: Oakley Sunglasses

  152. Pingback: mens nike free tr black

  153. Pingback: Ray Bans On Sale

  154. Pingback: Oakley Sunglasses Outlet Store

  155. Pingback: Cheap Oakley Sunglasses

  156. Pingback: hey

  157. Pingback: clash of clans apk

  158. Pingback: clash of clans

  159. Pingback: iherb quinoa pasta

  160. Pingback: iherb idebenone

  161. Pingback: iherb derma e overnight peel

  162. Pingback: iherb cq

  163. Pingback: iherb pantip

  164. Pingback: 1/2-Inch Drive Click Torque Wrench

  165. Pingback: 1/2-Inch Drive Click Torque Wrench

  166. Pingback: learn more

  167. Pingback: th8 farming base dec 2015

  168. Pingback: hey

  169. Pingback: read more here

  170. Pingback: jazz shoes

  171. Pingback: learn more here

  172. Pingback: read this

  173. Pingback: discover more

  174. Pingback: acai berry diet

  175. Pingback: ecm car

  176. Pingback: discover more here

  177. Pingback: retractable badge holder alligator clip

  178. Pingback: find out more

  179. Pingback: read this

  180. Pingback: read this

  181. Pingback: game of thrones watch online

  182. Pingback: Eddie Yan

  183. Pingback: discover more

  184. Pingback: find out more

  185. Pingback: vietnam children running photo

  186. Pingback: read this

  187. Pingback: siteground review

  188. Pingback: discover more here

  189. Pingback: custom essay writing service uk

  190. Pingback: buy essay usa

  191. Pingback: discover more here

  192. Pingback: essay buy nothing day

  193. Pingback: money can buy love essay

  194. Pingback: Prediksi Lengkap

  195. Pingback: custom term paper writing service

  196. Pingback: buy a book review essay

  197. Pingback: buy essay online for cheap

  198. Pingback: buy essay club review

  199. Pingback: fashion buying essays

  200. Pingback: click here

  201. Pingback: buy essay papers online

  202. Pingback: click here

  203. Pingback: see this here

  204. Pingback: read the full info here

  205. Pingback: be indian buy indian essay

  206. Pingback: what is the best essay writing service

  207. Pingback: custom paper writing service reviews

  208. Pingback: clip in hair extensions

  209. Pingback: express hair extensions

  210. Pingback: hair extensions online

  211. Pingback: get essays online free

  212. Pingback: gymnastics tumbling mats ebay

  213. Pingback: learn more here

  214. Pingback: go here

  215. Pingback: click here

  216. Pingback: cute down comforters

  217. Pingback: learn more

  218. Pingback: cute comforters queen

  219. Pingback: cute cheap dorm comforters

  220. Pingback: read more here

  221. Pingback: cute bedroom comforters

  222. Pingback: click here

  223. Pingback: cute teenage bed comforters

  224. Pingback: read review

  225. Pingback: you could try here

  226. Pingback: cute comforters

  227. Pingback: discover more

  228. Pingback: cute cheap dorm comforters

  229. Pingback: cute comforters for dorms

  230. Pingback: click here

  231. Pingback: cute comforters twin xl

  232. Pingback: cute green comforters

  233. Pingback: discover more

  234. Pingback: cute comforters for dorms

  235. Pingback: cute comforters

  236. Pingback: learn more

  237. Pingback: cute comforters twin xl

  238. Pingback: cute coral comforters

  239. Pingback: discover more

  240. Pingback: cute comforters for sale

  241. Pingback: cute bed comforters for college

  242. Pingback: cute country comforters

  243. Pingback: cute bohemian comforters

  244. Pingback: cute comforters for twin beds

  245. Pingback: cute comforters for college students

  246. Pingback: cute comforters

  247. Pingback: cute girl comforters

  248. Pingback: cute full bed comforters

  249. Pingback: cute hipster comforters

  250. Pingback: cute comforters

  251. Pingback: cute black comforters

  252. Pingback: cute comforters

  253. Pingback: cute comforters and bedding

  254. Pingback: cute coral comforters

  255. Pingback: cute baby comforters

  256. Pingback: cute cheetah comforters

  257. Pingback: cute comforters for college students

  258. Pingback: cute comforters cheap

  259. Pingback: cute comforters king size

  260. Pingback: cute comforters

  261. Pingback: cute beach comforters

  262. Pingback: cute comforters

  263. Pingback: cute daybed comforters

  264. Pingback: 1/4-Inch Drive Click Torque Wrench

  265. Pingback: lebron shoes

  266. Pingback: red stick notary

  267. Pingback: Hight Priest George Claud

  268. Pingback: clash royale gemmes gratuites

  269. Pingback: csgo skins irl

  270. Pingback: visit here

  271. Pingback: visit fat diminisher system here

  272. Pingback: cccam server

  273. Pingback: visit website

  274. Pingback: CSGO

  275. Pingback: viagra online

  276. Pingback: visit website

  277. Pingback: COUNTERSTRIKE

  278. Pingback: nba2k

  279. Pingback: how can time management help you in college

  280. Pingback: time management tips in gujarati

  281. Pingback: holistic stress management definition

  282. Pingback: Wholesale 7080 a Oakley Sunglasses ID8210334

  283. Pingback: http://www.osp-ua.info/ist/forum/topic/142.html

  284. Pingback: http://www.camaratimbo.sc.gov.br/forum/2016/469.html

  285. Pingback: hermes belt buckle sizes

  286. Pingback: Discover More

  287. Pingback: relevant website

  288. Pingback: click hyperlink

  289. Pingback: continue reading this..

  290. Pingback: relevant webpage

  291. Pingback: check this link right here now

  292. Pingback: company website

  293. Pingback: dance leotards for adults uk

  294. Pingback: anastrozole sales

  295. Pingback: skypepsyxologmoskvakiev

  296. Pingback: cheap football jerseys

  297. Pingback: saleforiphone

  298. Pingback: lebron james shoes

  299. Pingback: adidas nmd shoes

  300. Pingback: curry 2.5 shoes

  301. Pingback: stephen curry shoes

  302. Pingback: clomid for sale

  303. Pingback: nike nfl pittsburgh steelers

  304. Pingback: sale arcteryx

  305. Pingback: marmot essence sale

  306. Pingback: sergio rossi wedding shoes

  307. Pingback: arcteryx jacket atom lt

  308. Pingback: north face outlet orlando

  309. Pingback: parajumpers winter jacket

  310. Pingback: adidas outlet sale

  311. Pingback: coach outlets online

  312. Pingback: barbour outlet newcastle

  313. Pingback: payday loans

  314. Pingback: paydaycgtloansnhj.com

  315. Pingback: tubepatrol.net

  316. Pingback: xxx video hd

  317. Pingback: xxx hd video

  318. Pingback: смотреть онлайн фильмы 2017

  319. Pingback: payday loan

  320. Pingback: actual-news.pro

  321. Pingback: kd shoes store

  322. Pingback: nike huarache

  323. Pingback: Помощь психолога

  324. Pingback: rajwap.xyz

  325. Pingback: justindianporn.net

  326. Pingback: chuporn.net

  327. Pingback: Ñåðèàëû, ñìîòðåòü îíëàéí

  328. Pingback: pornbitter.com

  329. Pingback: pornonaft.net

  330. Pingback: javstreaming.mobi

  331. Pingback: top liwe

  332. Pingback: legendy-oseni filmix hd 720

  333. Pingback: blog list trust 2018

  334. Pingback: Èãðà Ïðåñòîëîâ 7 ñåçîí 8 ñåðèÿ

  335. Pingback: yotbub

  336. Pingback: yiou

  337. Pingback: hdkino720.info

  338. Pingback: youtotobe.info

  339. Pingback: serial

  340. Pingback: golubaya-laguna

  341. Pingback: articles

  342. Pingback: ebuuc.cn

  343. Pingback: Ertugrul 116-117

  344. Pingback: News 26 04 2018

  345. Pingback: socks5

  346. Pingback: serial online seriya smotret

  347. Pingback: Äîìàøíèé àðåñò âñå ñåðèè

  348. Pingback: domashnij-arest

Leave a Reply